Ask Dr. Forgiveness
Forgiveness strikes me as illegitimate. Here I am angry with a person, and so I start acting toward him as if all is well. That seems phony to me.
You are misunderstanding what forgiveness is. It is not about only actions toward the person at whom you are angry. Forgiveness is a more holistic moral virtue than this in that it includes a transformation toward more positive thoughts, feelings, and behaviors toward that person. When you act in a forgiving way, the more holistic approach includes both a softened heart with compassion as well as thoughts toward the person as someone of worth, not because of what was done but in spite of this. The behavior toward that person then includes these feelings and thoughts so that the behavior is not superficial or, as you say, phony.
I am a teacher, and my school is becoming interested in starting forgiveness education from kindergarten through grade 5. We have what are called restorative programs and so I am wondering what is the link between learning to forgive and practicing restorative justice.
Restorative practices tend to focus on dialogue, particularly dialogue in circles. This is a more behavioral approach than forgiveness, which focuses on what I call “the heart.” In other words, people who are angry with each other can dialogue civilly while in the circle, but if the heart is not healed of resentment, that anger can re-emerge once the circle ends for that day. Forgiveness first works on the anger in the heart so that the dialogue then might be more fruitful because the people are talking without deep resentment in the heart. Restorative practices and forgiveness can work very well together. I recommend this: First, work on forgiving those with whom you will dialogue in the circle and then enter the dialogue. It also could work this way: Enter the dialogue, and this could start to soften the heart toward whom you are angry. Then work on the forgiveness process after the circle ends.
Why do you think some people forgive easily while most of us have to struggle with the process?
The philosopher Aristotle reminded us that as people practice any moral virtue, then they become more developmentally advanced in it. Therefore, as people tend to practice forgiveness more regularly, they are ready to forgive the next time injustices emerge. Yet, we need to keep in mind that even the well-practiced people can struggle to forgive others for a new injustice if that unfairness is deeply unfair. Even when a grave injustice challenges the well-practiced people, they are likely to move through the forgiveness process more quickly and more deeply than people who are new at forgiving.
I would like to explore self-forgiveness. Do you have a recommended reading for me?
I recommend my book 8 Keys to Forgiveness (2015) published by Norton and available on amazon.com. One of the 8 keys is self-forgiveness. The chapter discusses the controversies about forgiving the self and how to go about engaging in self-forgiveness.
What does it mean to have a change of heart toward the one who offended me? Can I just will this and, presto, I am changed? Does it take a while, and if so, what is the endpoint to which I am striving?
A change of heart is a qualitatively new set of feelings and thoughts toward the one who offended you. This usually is not some kind of instantaneous willed change but instead can take time. The change of heart usually includes a slow transformation of anger to reduced anger, to a softened heart, which can include compassion or a willingness to suffer along with the other, who may be suffering from what was done to you or from being abused by others in the past. As you see the other’s struggles and do not define this person predominantly by the unjust actions against you, this compassion can grow in your heart. The endpoint is the cessation or reduction of anger toward the person and growing compassion for this person.
