Author Archive: directorifi

I hold quite different political opinions from my partner. He certainly does not appreciate my position, but I do respect his. We have a lot of arguments. I want to know how I can forgive him for being so combative about politics.

You should discuss what it is to be a human with him, in my opinion. Do individuals transcend their political stances? What is this “more” that transcends politics, if any? Does he think you have these other significant traits? He should, in my opinion, widen his understanding that people are more significant than politics. He and you will need to work on this more transcendent viewpoint because it can be difficult to learn. Try to perceive your partner’s broader human traits as you extend forgiveness. Both of you having a broader viewpoint of the other will probably help your relationship.

From your reading, what is the earliest document that focuses, to at least some extent, on person-to-person forgiving?

From my reading, the earliest account of person-to-person forgiveness that gives some details is the story of Joseph forgiving his half-brothers for attempted murder and selling him into slavery in Egypt.  You can read this important narrative in Genesis, chapters 37-45.  The fact that nine chapters are devoted to this story of forgiveness is impressive.

Addressing the “Both/And” Approach to Family Conflict: Why This Is Insufficient for Healing

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya, Pexels.com

I recently read a self-help article about family conflict.  The author was advocating for what is called the “both/and” approach to healing.  It means this: Acknowledge the hurts against you, but also focus on times of positive interaction.  Both are truthful, and if you can live with both side by side, this will promote healing.

I write this essay to respectfully disagree with this approach to family healing.  I think it can be a first step, but it is incomplete by itself.  It is so incomplete that I think it could lead to future conflicts rather than deep emotional and relational healing.

Let me start with an analogy.  Suppose you damaged the cartilage in your knee.  It annoys you and diminishes your quality of life because you cannot work out as rigorously as before.  Yet, you have strong shoulders.  If you take a literal “both/and” approach here, you will live with the broken-down knee and the strong shoulders.  You can still work out, such as bench pressing or bicep curls.  Yet, your ability to run now is hampered.  Should you simply live with all of this or try to heal the knee?  I vote for healing the knee.

It seems to me that this analogy applies to the “both/and” of family conflict.  Yes, you have the challenge of injustice and the happy times, but isn’t it more beneficial to go for the healing from the resentment that has built up in the heart from the injustices?  As with knee surgery, resentment in the heart can be healed by forgiving those who caused the pain.  Yes, you still have a memory of the injustice, but now the emotional reaction to that memory is healed.  The “both/and” is not likely to eventually lead to the “and” of resentment overpowering the “and” of fond memories.  After all, resentment is a formidable foe.  It can last for years and grow, overpowering any positive thoughts about the other person.

So, yes, let us be aware of the “both/and” as we do with a torn knee and strong shoulders, but let us move beyond that to forgiving those who caused the damage to the heart through unjust actions.  “Both/and” focuses on insight.  Moving forward with forgiveness focuses on healing once the insight is understood, confronted, and the forgiveness is accomplished.

I just saw on an Internet website the idea that one can “forgive God.”  As a Christian believer, can I forgive God?

Absolutely not.  Your theology will be very distorted if you think that you can “forgive God.”  After all, forgiving takes place when the other acted very unjustly.  Christians know God as all perfect, sinless, and holy.  Acting unjustly, therefore, does not happen here.  If you are disappointed with people’s injustices in the world, focus on the truth that it is those persons, not God, who decided to act unjustly.  As Christians know, God has given each person free will so that they are not robots.  They are free to love, and at the same time, they are free to disobey God and act unjustly.  Be careful not to fall into the considerable error that when people disappoint you, it is God’s fault.  It is not.

If people are in denial about the depth of their anger, will they need help (feedback) from others to overcome it?

Feedback might help to overcome the denial, but this will depend on how the feedback is given.  For example, if the feedback is presented in an accusatory way, the person in denial might continue to deny the depth of the anger, concluding that the person giving the feedback is harsh and temperamental.  If the feedback is gentle and loving, this still may take time for the one in denial to bring the level of anger to consciousness.  In other words, patience and gentle persistence may be effective in the long run.  Another approach might be this: Instead of focusing first on the anger, a person giving feedback might shift the focus to the denying person’s inner world and whether or not the person is feeling disrupted, anxious, or unhappy.  If the one who is denying can see one’s own inner pain (rather than the anger), this might motivate this person to answer the question, “What might be a primary cause of your inner disruption or unhappiness?”  The cause could be unjust treatment by others that was never resolved internally by the one who was angry.  Seeing the connection between past injustices and current unhappiness could open the door to the realization that the injustices have caused unhealthy anger that now is responsible for the internal disruption, anxiety, and unhappiness.  Once that anger is uncovered (no longer denied), the person might be open to trying forgiveness as a way of dealing constructively with the injustice, the anger, and the resulting unhappiness.