Tagged: “Dr. Robert Enright”

Are there any studies showing a cause-and-effect relationship between learning how to forgive and cardiac health?

Yes, we have an experimental study in which we screened cardiac patients for deep injustices against them and the presence of anger.  When the experimental group (which had a forgiveness intervention) was compared with the control group (which had heart-health instruction in the hospital setting), the experimental group, after the intervention, had more blood flow through the heart compared with the participants in the control group.  Here is the reference to that work:

Waltman, M.A., Russell, D.C., Coyle, C.T., Enright, R.D., Holter, A.C., & Swoboda, C. (2009). The effects of a forgiveness intervention on patients with coronary artery disease.  Psychology and Health, 24, 11-27.

What is the difference between acceptance and forgiveness?

When you forgive, you do not have to accept the situation of unfairness against you.  You can and should see what happened as unfair.  When you forgive a person, you offer goodness toward that person in an active way.  This can include kindness and even love in which you will the good of the other.  Acceptance of a person seems too passive to capture the essence of what forgiveness is.  You can accept a person’s actions without being either kind or loving.

A close cousin of mine has a terrible habit. “Please forgive me for this,” he begs me before criticizing me more. How can one forgive someone who plans out their meanness in advance and then acts on it? This kind of thing is difficult for me to forgive.

I can appreciate how frustrated you are. The relative clearly knows that this will cause you pain, but still proceeds. It is evident that he knows this could hurt you because he would not have asked for your forgiveness in advance. This is an obvious issue of injustice for you. Given the circumstances, it would be wise to attempt to forgive him even if you know it might take longer due to the continuing unjust context. At the same time, try to exercise justice, after you have a forgiving heart, so that you can ask for fairness in a temperate and gentle way.

Forgiveness can be different things to different people. Why bother saying it has an essence for everyone everywhere in the world?:

You are approaching forgiveness from the viewpoint of philosophical relativism.  With this approach, then there is no possibility of doing forgiveness research because you could not possibly derive a measure of forgiveness since everyone has an idiosyncratic opinion of it.  If forgiveness is a moral virtue, then is it the case that all moral virtues are relative?  If so, then what is justice?  If a person robs a bank and claims it is just because the bank has a lot of money and will not miss $1,000, does this make it fair?  Is the person exercising the moral virtue of justice?  If our world is orderly and if moral virtues have coherence, then they have essences and this would include forgiveness.

I have heard that forgiveness is not a moral virtue but instead is a psychological skill in which a person reduces resentment toward an offender.  Why do you call it a moral virtue?

All moral virtues are concerned with goodness toward others.  For example, justice is to be fair to others.  When we forgive, at least on its highest level (whether or not a particular person reaches this level), we are offering kindness, respect, and even love toward those who have been unfair to us as forgivers.  Given this willed goodness toward an offending person, this is a quintessential sign of goodness. If forgiveness is only being less resentful toward an offending person, this could be achieved, for example, by seeing that person as so less than human that you feel sorry for this person, thus reducing resentment.  This seems too narrow and reductionistic.